WORKS
SCENIC GARDENC294 APT
DL1310 APT
PAVILION ( )
Z53 SOCIAL HOUSING
THREE MUSEUMS AND A PARK
ODP APT
DUBAI CREEK HARBOUR
TL 2816LEÓN SOCIAL HOUSING
C356
CHAPULTEPEC 500
M193 APT
AL APT
HIYA
TORRE F44
OKU
ART WELLNESS RETREAR
ZD ATP
JV82 APT
OKU PEDREGAL
P1 APT
DT APT
CASA 11
NIDO HQ
OSTRERÍA 109
FERRY TERMINAL
S20
G120
C47 APT
P291 APT
E33 APT
DN1202 APT
ILC1109 APT
DL 5155 APTDL 5155 APT V2
HC APT
TORRE INSURGENTES
LUMA CAFÉ
JD LANDSCAPE
SPORTS CENTER
AVT APT
LP NO. 12
ARCHIVO PAVILION
SCHOOL IN TULUM
HANGING OBJECTS
ROBATA WINEBAR
LINEAR PARK
QUASI THING
IKZA
PAU SCHOOL OF ARCH.
SLIGHTLY FAMILIAR
RESTAURANT IN TULUM
HOTEL IN SRI LANKA
IV APOTHECARY
IV APOTHECARY TJ
MAYORGA ROOFTOP
SANTA MARÍA APT
2875 APT
CONGRESO APT
PLI
ANAMUR SOCIAL CENTER
BOLICHE MARSELLA
TRIPAS SONORAS
SHOA MEMORIAL
BLUE RUIN
ÇANAKKALE ANTENNA
SPORTS COMPLEX
CH430 APT
E33 APT
TL2888 APT
PSA APT
EXPLORATIONS
VANISHING CONCRETEBRICK ORNAMENTS
CONCRETE HYPAR
STUCCO HATCHES
TERRAZZO
TRAVERTINE EXTRUSIONS
BOOLEAN TOTEM
WICKER GLITCH LAMPMATERIAL PAINT
FLOWERS
SYMMETRIES
DIGITAL PAINT
ABOUT
PEOPLE
CORE SERVICES
NEWS
CONTACT
PAU SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE
In collaboration with KOTUstudio and Sina Ozbudun
PAU School of Architecture and Design situates itself in a social zone with a loaded program, in the Southwest corner of the campus. This is also a transition space between the built environment and the vast surrounding landscape. The project site can itself be rather inspiring for design students, who grow in an environment that has clear tension between the built and unbuilt.
The dualist mode of thinking in the contemporary architectural profession about the relationship between the building and the site fluctuates between either disguising the building with natural elements and creating a false sense of nature, or undermining the site by fetishizing the figure. This project sits in between, where the artificial and the natural are in a symbiotic relationship. The building is lightly positioned on the hill in three different elevations. The difference in elevations not only brings diversity to the relationship between the spaces, but also makes reference to the tectonics of Pamukkale’s symbolic travertine terraces.
Programmatic separation begins as the building diverges symmetrically into three wings from the main axis further away from the entrance. As the wings meet the circulation nodes communal spaces are formed. The middle wing which lies on the main axis is the circulation spine, and creates two coterminous loops as it meets with other two wings on different instances. The courtyards in the loops provide space for exhibitions, leisure, and activities for the students. These two courtyards that differ in size are made semi-private by the location of the different departments of the faculty, which in turn are surrounded by the café on the main axis, which serves both of these open areas and unifies them visually. The merging instances of the building home the vertical circulations and fire escapes, whereas the linear stairs on the rest of the wings provide fast circulation between floors. The directional stripes of the building are frequently interrupted with vertical internal courtyards and lightwells to minimize the perception of a tight and linear space.
The dualist mode of thinking in the contemporary architectural profession about the relationship between the building and the site fluctuates between either disguising the building with natural elements and creating a false sense of nature, or undermining the site by fetishizing the figure. This project sits in between, where the artificial and the natural are in a symbiotic relationship. The building is lightly positioned on the hill in three different elevations. The difference in elevations not only brings diversity to the relationship between the spaces, but also makes reference to the tectonics of Pamukkale’s symbolic travertine terraces.
Programmatic separation begins as the building diverges symmetrically into three wings from the main axis further away from the entrance. As the wings meet the circulation nodes communal spaces are formed. The middle wing which lies on the main axis is the circulation spine, and creates two coterminous loops as it meets with other two wings on different instances. The courtyards in the loops provide space for exhibitions, leisure, and activities for the students. These two courtyards that differ in size are made semi-private by the location of the different departments of the faculty, which in turn are surrounded by the café on the main axis, which serves both of these open areas and unifies them visually. The merging instances of the building home the vertical circulations and fire escapes, whereas the linear stairs on the rest of the wings provide fast circulation between floors. The directional stripes of the building are frequently interrupted with vertical internal courtyards and lightwells to minimize the perception of a tight and linear space.
Location: Denizli, Turkey
Type: Competition, School of Architecture and Design
Structure: Multiple
Team: Isaac Michan Daniel, Erdem Tüzün, Yelta Köm, Sina Özbudun, Tarık Keskin, Arturo Lezama, Narciso Martinez, Omar Acevedo, Jorge Sanchez
Status: 3rd Mention Prize
Year: 2016
Advisors: Ozan Tüzün, Doruk Kemal Kaplan
Technical advisors: Bahadır Acuner (Structural Engineer), Nebahat Çay (Mechanical Engineer), Selçuk Özdoğan (Electrical Engineer)
Type: Competition, School of Architecture and Design
Structure: Multiple
Team: Isaac Michan Daniel, Erdem Tüzün, Yelta Köm, Sina Özbudun, Tarık Keskin, Arturo Lezama, Narciso Martinez, Omar Acevedo, Jorge Sanchez
Status: 3rd Mention Prize
Year: 2016
Advisors: Ozan Tüzün, Doruk Kemal Kaplan
Technical advisors: Bahadır Acuner (Structural Engineer), Nebahat Çay (Mechanical Engineer), Selçuk Özdoğan (Electrical Engineer)